At least half of OnFitness Magazine is material from previous OnFitness issues. Some articles are rerun three times, four times.
The Weights & Measures section is all old material. The repeats are often less than a year old. The publisher thinks subscribers won't notice this. Do you want to pay 9 bucks for a magazine that has material you already read?
I don't think so. This is every single issue. I’m sure there are many subscribers who’ve caught onto this fiasco. The publisher is wondering why sales has dropped and has blamed a key writer of submitting stories that were online first.
This is false. Sales have dropped because readers have caught on that at least half of any issue is recycled material from previous issues.
Product or Service Mentioned:
Reason of review: Bad quality.